It is currently Wed Aug 20, 2008 9:58 am



Welcome to Indiefreak.net!

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
New postPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 6:43 pm 
Offline
Indie Fanatic
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 11:49 pm
Posts: 254
Location: Around
I don't know where you heard that from, but I was unaware.

_________________
Sam


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Saw 4
New postPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 4:38 am 
Offline
Fresh Freak

Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 6:11 am
Posts: 26
netridge wrote:
Hey I heard that the first saw was based on actual events that happened, are 2,3,4 also based on real events or was it just the 1st.


I think it was something along the lines of there was a serial murderer nicknamed Jigsaw, who tried to make people see what they were doing wrong. Think that's about as far as it goes.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
New postPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:55 am 
Offline
Fresh Freak
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 1:41 pm
Posts: 29
Location: Fairfax, VA
I have 4 major types of movies:

Good-Good movies: these are the high-calibur movies that are truely inspiring and worth seeing. see: The Departed

Good-Bad movies: these are pop-corn movies that are just so entertaining you can't help but like them. see: Predator

Bad-Good movies: this is the abslute worst. movies that try to achieve greatness and fail horribly. see: Pearl Harbor

and Bad-bad movies: this is just a stupid movie made even worse. sometimes not even worth finishing. see: Battlefield Earth

The thing that frustrate me most is that all too often the movies that make the most money and please the most crowds are the Bad-Good ones. Michael Bay has mastered this art form. They usually star someone like Mel Gibson or Denzel Wash. as a single dad trying to make ends meet, or perhaps Danney Glover or Martin Sheen as the obsessive detective who's half crazy but always dedicated to the job. These movies leave nothing to think about or ponder after seeing them because most people dont like to be confused about something they have already paid for. You may think the police are close to catching the antagonist about 1/2 way into the film, but alas, it was just a look-a-like and the cops are back to square one leaving a single genius detective with the burden of putting the pieces together. They often need to have a twist at the end, a twist so impossible that no one could have seen it coming! Something like having the killer and the hero actually be the same person! Movies like this are usually described by their target audience as "F-ing awesome", or are proclaimed "The best movie ever made" immediately (see Transformers); these people usually cannot comprehend criticism to their friday night action flick and defend it by referencing how "awesome" the computer graphics and explosions were. Sometimes it feels like society is getting "Dumber and Dumber ". :shock:


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re:
New postPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 9:24 am 
Offline
Fresh Freak

Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 6:11 am
Posts: 26
erikthered wrote:
I have 4 major types of movies:

Good-Good movies: these are the high-calibur movies that are truely inspiring and worth seeing. see: The Departed

Good-Bad movies: these are pop-corn movies that are just so entertaining you can't help but like them. see: Predator

Bad-Good movies: this is the abslute worst. movies that try to achieve greatness and fail horribly. see: Pearl Harbor

and Bad-bad movies: this is just a stupid movie made even worse. sometimes not even worth finishing. see: Battlefield Earth

The thing that frustrate me most is that all too often the movies that make the most money and please the most crowds are the Bad-Good ones. Michael Bay has mastered this art form. They usually star someone like Mel Gibson or Denzel Wash. as a single dad trying to make ends meet, or perhaps Danney Glover or Martin Sheen as the obsessive detective who's half crazy but always dedicated to the job. These movies leave nothing to think about or ponder after seeing them because most people dont like to be confused about something they have already paid for. You may think the police are close to catching the antagonist about 1/2 way into the film, but alas, it was just a look-a-like and the cops are back to square one leaving a single genius detective with the burden of putting the pieces together. They often need to have a twist at the end, a twist so impossible that no one could have seen it coming! Something like having the killer and the hero actually be the same person! Movies like this are usually described by their target audience as "F-ing awesome", or are proclaimed "The best movie ever made" immediately (see Transformers); these people usually cannot comprehend criticism to their friday night action flick and defend it by referencing how "awesome" the computer graphics and explosions were. Sometimes it feels like society is getting "Dumber and Dumber ". :shock:



It's cool that you know exactly what you think, but unless you're a film critic, why not just sit back and enjoy? Not every film can be amazing.

I consider myself an inteligent person, I know Transformers is not inteligent in any way, but still top notch entertainment.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
New postPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 9:51 am 
Offline
Indie Fanatic
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 11:49 pm
Posts: 254
Location: Around
first of all, addressing erik, we actually made a transformers hate thread. haha. so you should copy paste your post in that thread!

and to bookie, i can see what you are saying but i just can't ever try to admit transformers was top notch entertainment.

but alas, this all belongs in the transformers hate thread.

Peace!

_________________
Sam


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Re:
New postPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 10:05 am 
Offline
Fresh Freak
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 1:41 pm
Posts: 29
Location: Fairfax, VA
BookieAlerts wrote:

It's cool that you know exactly what you think, but unless you're a film critic, why not just sit back and enjoy? Not every film can be amazing.

I consider myself an inteligent person, I know Transformers is not inteligent in any way, but still top notch entertainment.


I agree with the sit back and enjoy part; that is when you need a "good-bad" movie. for instance, a while back my friends and i had an Arnold marathon - now we are all in agreement that Kindergarten Cop is not a good-good movie, but it IS a good-bad movie, and it served its purpose well. Transformers was billed as the next great action movie and...it wasn't. Hasbro would be rolling over in it's toy box.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
New postPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 10:37 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 6:36 pm
Posts: 439
Location: Washington DC
Hmm Die Hard 4 fit my good-bad mold then. I think I'll start a thread on this ... thanks Erik.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re:
New postPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 10:43 am 
Offline
Fresh Freak
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 1:41 pm
Posts: 29
Location: Fairfax, VA
GoodOmens wrote:
Hmm Die Hard 4 fit my good-bad mold then. I think I'll start a thread on this ... thanks Erik.

DEFinitely a "Good-Bad" Movie.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
New postPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 12:14 am 
Offline
Indie Fanatic
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 11:49 pm
Posts: 254
Location: Around
I think in the whole your scheme of good-good good-bad etc. you are missing a huge section.

they are it's-worth-seeing-it-once movies. it fits right in the middle.

they aren't good movies, they aren't bad movies, they don't really entertain, but they don't really make you feel stupid.

it's like background music. the movie is just kind of taking up time. it has a plot, characters, but it's hard to strike up a discussion about the movie. "mediocre" is the best word for this type. i think this should be incorporated into your system. there are lots of these movies out. in fact, a majority of them are this in my opinion. A good genre that fits into this scheme would be family movies, such as Secondhand Lions. I watched it once and was kind of meh about it. And that's it. I won't ever watch it again, but I did watch it and I have nothing to say about it.

_________________
Sam


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Saw 4
New postPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2007 11:29 pm 
Offline
Indie Protégé
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 6:32 pm
Posts: 49
I loved the first one...great twist at the end. I enjoyed the following sequals, but I really think they're milking this one a bit too much. I'll wait and critique the final product though...as I'll definitely be watching it. Last I heard, this was going to be somewhat of a prequel to the other 3. Is this still the case?

_________________
http://www.popular-tv.com - Discussion Forum for the Most Popular Shows on Television


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group  
phpBB SEO